[Feature Suggestion - WEIRD] Remote database for storing records ? #1298

New Issue

MrUnknownDE · 2026-04-05T17:13:04+02:00

MrUnknownDE commented

2026-04-05 17:13:04 +02:00

Originally created by @Miner28 on 11/18/2021

So as I mentioned this is a bit weird and unnecessary suggestion but would make my life easier… Any way to implement remote database connections like PostgreSQL for storing all the records instead of local DB ? Some kind of Master and user system for having 1 Master VRCX client running that would append to the database and then user client only reading ? I like to run my VRCX 24/7 on my home PC, but when I'm somewhere else, it's hard to access the records when I need to.

Not sure how hard would this be to implement, and not sure if others would find the use in this ?

*Originally created by @Miner28 on 11/18/2021* So as I mentioned this is a bit weird and unnecessary suggestion but would make my life easier… Any way to implement remote database connections like PostgreSQL for storing all the records instead of local DB ? Some kind of Master and user system for having 1 Master VRCX client running that would append to the database and then user client only reading ? I like to run my VRCX 24/7 on my home PC, but when I'm somewhere else, it's hard to access the records when I need to. Not sure how hard would this be to implement, and not sure if others would find the use in this ?

MrUnknownDE closed this issue

2026-04-05 17:13:04 +02:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Label

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github/VRCX#1298